Purpose-built ABET accreditation management for engineering programs

Purpose-built for ABET EAC — CO-PO mapping, gap analysis, AI evidence evaluation, and Criterion 4 tracking in one place.

ABET Readiness Dashboard

Last updated: Today
Criterion 1: Students
Evidence on file
Criterion 4: Continuous Improvement
Documentation gap flagged
Criterion 5: Curriculum
Evidence on file
Student Outcomes Assessed6 / 7
Criterion 4 Cycles Active2
Report Sections Complete3 / 8
SO 4 — No Assessed-level evidence

ABET accreditation shouldn't be a scrambling sprint every 6 years

Too Late to Fix

You don't discover documentation gaps until 6 months before the site visit — when it's too late to collect missing evidence or implement improvements.

Disconnected Documentation

Student outcomes data, continuous improvement evidence, and assessment results scattered across spreadsheets, faculty computers, and filing cabinets.

"Closing the Loop" is Hard

Documenting that you actually used assessment results to improve your program - the most common ABET citation - requires evidence that's difficult to maintain across 6-year cycles.

Ongoing ABET accreditation support, powered by AI

1

Upload Your Documentation

Upload course syllabi and evidence documents — or enter data directly. Your program, your workflow.

2

AI Analysis in Minutes

AI parses your syllabi to extract course outcomes and suggest CO-PO mappings. Evidence documents are evaluated against the ABET criteria they address — so you can spot documentation gaps before a reviewer sees them

3

Get Your Readiness Dashboard

See exactly where your coverage gaps are and which required fields are missing — organized by criterion, before they become findings.

What's in the App

CO-PO Matrix

Map course outcomes to program outcomes across your entire curriculum. See coverage at a glance and identify gaps before your site visit.

Gap Analysis

Instantly see which program outcomes lack sufficient evidence coverage. Know exactly what to address before your reviewers do.

AI Evidence Evaluation

Upload syllabi, assessment reports, and supporting documents. AI evaluates each piece against ABET criteria and flags potential gaps for your review.

Criterion 4 Workflows

Document your continuous improvement cycles with a structured 4-stage process. Build a well-organized evidence record aligned with what ABET looks for — automatically.

Self-Study Report

Your program data populates the self-study report automatically. Export as Markdown today, with additional formats on the roadmap.

Multi-User Team Access

Invite coordinators and faculty to collaborate. Program directors manage the program, faculty upload evidence — everyone in one place.

See dal.ai in action

Watch a quick walkthrough of the platform.

Built for engineering program directors and department chairs

Mechanical Engineering Programs

Stay ahead of ABET Criterion 4 (Continuous Improvement) and demonstrate systematic assessment processes.

Electrical & Computer Engineering Programs

Maintain ABET accreditation readiness while managing rapid curriculum changes and emerging technologies.

Civil, Chemical & Industrial Engineering Programs

Track student outcomes and document program improvements across multiple accreditation cycles.

All ABET-Accredited Engineering Disciplines

Biomedical, Aerospace, Environmental, Industrial — we support all engineering programs seeking or maintaining ABET EAC accreditation. Computing programs (CAC) coming soon.

Why I'm Building This

Hi, I'm Sean — a software engineer who's spent the last year listening to program directors, coordinators, and deans talk about what ABET accreditation actually looks like from the inside.

The same themes keep coming up:

  • "Six years of assessment data is scattered everywhere — faculty laptops, old email threads, a filing cabinet nobody has the key to."
  • "Getting faculty to submit materials on time is a full-time job in itself."
  • "Generic accreditation tools make us do all the ABET thinking ourselves."

One program director told me:

"I'm seriously considering resigning to avoid the self-study work next year."

That one stuck with me. No one should want to quit their job to avoid accreditation prep.

I built dal.ai because accreditation shouldn't break the person holding it together. It should be the thing the software holds together — so the person can focus on teaching, research, and the work they actually signed up for.

Request a Demo

Ready to see it in action?

Book a 30-minute demo. We'll walk you through the app and answer any questions about your program.

Frequently asked questions